Ksp and Solubility Calculations
Learn and apply Ksp and Solubility Calculations in the published Chemistry course sequence.
Continue where you stopped
The core idea
On this page
Ksp and Solubility Calculations: Orientation
In Kₛₚ questions, the marks come from doing the setup correctly: write the dissolution equilibrium, write the right Kₛₚ expression, then link ion concentrations to solubility s. This lesson gives a repeatable workflow and the Qₛₚ vs Kₛₚ precipitation test.
If the acid-base foundations feel rusty, revisit Acids and Bases (Theories) and keep the Aqueous Equilibria hub open for linked methods.
Definitions (Must Know)
A. Solubility product, Kₛₚ
For a sparingly soluble salt:
B. Ionic product, Qₛₚ
The ionic product, Qₛₚ, is calculated using the current ion concentrations (not necessarily equilibrium). Comparing Qₛₚ with Kₛₚ tells you whether a precipitate forms.
Detailed Explanations
A. Workflow: writing the Kₛₚ expression (method marks)
- Write the dissolution equilibrium with correct charges and coefficients.
- Omit the pure solid from the expression.
- Raise each ion concentration to the power of its coefficient.
Mini example: CaF₂(s) ⇌ Ca²⁺(aq) + 2F-(aq) So Kₛₚ = [Ca²⁺][F⁻]².
B. Workflow: solubility from Kₛₚ (typical exam method)
If MX(s) ⇌ M + (aq) + X-(aq) and solubility is s:
If MX₂(s) ⇌ M²⁺(aq) + 2X-(aq) and solubility is s:
Because Kₛₚ is an equilibrium constant at a fixed temperature, therefore once the solution is saturated you must have Qₛₚ = Kₛₚ using the equilibrium ion concentrations.
C. Workflow: precipitation prediction (Qₛₚ vs Kₛₚ)
- Find ion concentrations after mixing/dilution (use total volume).
- Calculate Qₛₚ from those concentrations.
- Compare:
- because Qₛₚ > Kₛₚ means the ion product is too large, therefore ions must be removed → precipitate forms
- if Qₛₚ < Kₛₚ, no precipitate forms
Worked Examples
Modelled example 1
Find molar solubility for a one-to-one salt
Problem
Study the worked solution
Write the dissolution equilibrium
Method
Dissociate one formula unit into its aqueous ions.Reason
The coefficients determine how molar solubility maps to equilibrium concentrations.Working
AgCl(s) ⇌ Ag + (aq) + Cl-(aq).Express concentrations using s
Method
Let the molar solubility be s.Reason
Each mole of dissolved AgCl forms one mole of each ion.Working
[Ag⁺] = s, [Cl⁻] = s, so Kₛₚ = s².Solve and check
Method
Take the positive square root.Reason
Concentration cannot be negative.Working
s = square root of (1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰) = 1.34 × 10⁻⁵ mol dm⁻³.
Guided practice 2
Predict precipitation after mixing
Problem
Try this before viewing the solution
Hints
Hint 1: account for total volume
Hint 2: compare the ion product
View solution step by step
Find concentrations immediately after mixing
Method
Apply the twofold dilution to both ions.Reason
Each solute occupies twice its original volume before any precipitation is considered.Working
[Ag⁺] = [Cl⁻] = 5.0 × 10⁻⁴ mol dm⁻³.Calculate the trial ion product
Method
Use the same concentration powers as the Kₛₚ expression.Reason
Qₛₚ tests whether the mixed solution contains more free ions than saturation permits.Working
Qₛₚ = (5.0 × 10⁻⁴)² = 2.5 × 10⁻⁷.Compare and conclude
Method
Compare Qₛₚ with Kₛₚ.Reason
The ion product is much larger than the equilibrium value, so ions must be removed from solution.Working
2.5 × 10⁻⁷ is greater than 1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰; therefore AgCl(s) precipitates.
Common misconception 3
Carry coefficients into the Ksp expression
Learner claim
Choose the concentration mapping
View solution step by step
Correct the dissolution mapping
Method
Use the coefficient two for fluoride.Reason
CaF₂(s) ⇌ Ca²⁺(aq) + 2F-(aq) forms twice as many fluoride ions.Working
[Ca²⁺] = s and [F⁻] = 2s.Build the Ksp expression
Method
Raise fluoride concentration to its stoichiometric power.Reason
The exponent comes from the balanced dissolution equation.Working
Kₛₚ = [Ca²⁺][F⁻]² = s(2s)² = 4s³.Solve the cubic
Method
Divide by four and take the positive cube root.Reason
The concentration relationship is cubic, not quadratic.Working
s = ((3.9 × 10⁻¹¹)/4)^(1/3) = 2.14 × 10⁻⁴ mol dm⁻³.
Examiner practice 4
Calculate Ksp from measured solubility
Problem
Try this before viewing the solution
View solution step by step
Write the dissolution equation
1 markMethod
Balance the ions released by one formula unit.Reason
The coefficients determine concentrations and powers.Working
Mg(OH)₂(s) ⇌ Mg²⁺(aq) + 2OH-(aq).Map solubility to ions
1 markReason
One mole of solid produces one mole of magnesium ions and two moles of hydroxide ions.Working
[Mg²⁺] = s and [OH⁻] = 2s.State the expression
1 markReason
The pure solid is omitted and hydroxide has power two.Working
Kₛₚ = s(2s)² = 4s³.Calculate Ksp
1 markMethod
Substitute the measured molar solubility.Reason
The equilibrium ion concentrations derive from that saturated-solution value.Working
Kₛₚ = 4(1.20 × 10⁻⁴)³ = 6.91 × 10⁻¹².
Self-mark with the mark scheme
Compare your response with each mark point. Select a point only when your response contains that evidence.
Credit the balanced dissolution, ion mapping, expression and numerical Ksp.
Challenge 5
Find the concentration at precipitation onset
Problem
Try this before viewing the solution
Hints
Hint 1: use the boundary condition
Hint 2: make chloride the unknown
View solution step by step
Set the saturation boundary
Method
Use equality at precipitation onset.Reason
Below saturation no solid forms; at the boundary Qₛₚ = Kₛₚ.Working
[Ag⁺][Cl⁻] = 1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰.Solve for chloride
Method
Divide by the fixed silver-ion concentration.Reason
The AgCl expression has one-to-one concentration powers.Working
[Cl⁻] = (1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰)/(2.0 × 10⁻⁴) = 9.0 × 10⁻⁷ mol dm⁻³.Interpret concentrations above the boundary
Method
Compare a larger chloride concentration with the threshold.Reason
It would make Qₛₚ exceed Kₛₚ.Working
Above 9.0 × 10⁻⁷ mol dm⁻³, AgCl precipitates until the free-ion product returns to Kₛₚ.
Mind Stretchers
Mind stretcher 1Extension
Kₛₚ(AgCl) = 1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰ and Kₛₚ(Ag₂CrO₄) = 1.1 × 10⁻¹². Which salt is more soluble in pure water? (Show a solubility calculation for both.)
Show Answer
Mark scheme:
- AgCl(s) ⇌ Ag + (aq) + Cl-(aq): Kₛₚ = s² ⇒ s = square root of (1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰) = 1.34 × 10⁻⁵
- Ag₂CrO₄(s) ⇌ 2Ag + (aq) + CrO₄²⁻(aq): Kₛₚ = (2s)²(s) = 4s³
- s = ((1.1 × 10⁻¹²)/4)^(1/3) = 6.50 × 10⁻⁵
- Therefore Ag₂CrO₄ is more soluble (stoichiometry matters, not just Kₛₚ size).