Zero And First Order Graphs

Learn and apply Zero And First Order Graphs in the published Chemistry course sequence.

  • GCE A-Level H1 Chemistry 8873-2027
On this page

H1 Zero- and First-order Graphs and Half-life: Orientation

Concentration–time evidence distinguishes zero and first order through shape, gradient and successive half-lives. H1 uses graphical reasoning without integrated rate equations.

H1 8873 scope
  • Justify zero- or first-order behaviour and recognise concentration-independent first-order half-life.
  • Do not use integrated forms, ln plots, or calculate k from t_(1/2).

Definitions (Must Know)

  • A concentration–time graph shows how a reactant concentration changes during a reaction.
  • Half-life, t_(1/2), is the time for a reactant concentration to fall to half its current value.
  • A zero-order reactant is consumed at a constant rate under the stated conditions.
  • A first-order reactant has a rate proportional to its concentration.

Detailed Explanations

A. Zero-order evidence

A straight concentration–time line has constant negative gradient. Equal amounts are consumed in equal times, so successive halvings take less time as concentration falls.

B. First-order evidence

The curve becomes less steep because rate falls with concentration. Each halving takes the same time, so half-life is independent of the concentration from which the interval begins.

The reason is proportionality: for a first-order reactant, rate is proportional to concentration. Starting from half the concentration, there is half as much reactant to lose before the concentration halves, and at every matching point along the way the rate is also half as large. The two effects cancel, so the halving takes the same time.

C. Reading a graph fairly

Use clear horizontal and vertical guide lines and quote approximate intervals with sensible precision. Allow for experimental scatter.

D. Keep this at H1 depth

H1 explains these signatures directly. Integrated equations, logarithmic plots and k = 0.693/t_(1/2) belong outside this prescribed treatment.

Worked Examples

Modelled example 1

First-order evidence

Core

Problem

A falls from 0.80 to 0.40 mol dm⁻³ in 30 s and from 0.40 to 0.20 mol dm⁻³ in another 30 s. State the order supported by these data.
Study the worked solution
  1. Identify the intervals

    Method

    Recognise both changes as successive halvings.

    Reason

    0.40 is half of 0.80, and 0.20 is half of 0.40.

    Working

    First half-life = 30 s; second half-life = 30 s.
  2. Infer the order

    Method

    Use the approximately constant successive half-lives.

    Reason

    Concentration-independent half-life is the prescribed first-order signature.

    Working

    The evidence supports first order in A.

Guided practice 2

Zero-order evidence

About 6 min

Problem

A straight concentration–time line falls from 0.60 to 0.30 mol dm⁻³ in 40 s. Predict the time from the start at which it reaches zero if the same regime continues.

Try this before viewing the solution

Hints

Hint 1: use the straight line
A straight line has constant gradient, so equal absolute concentration decreases take equal times.
Hint 2: repeat the decrease
The remaining decrease from 0.30 to zero is the same size as the first decrease.
View solution step by step
  1. Compare concentration changes

    Method

    Calculate the first decrease and the remaining decrease.

    Reason

    Both are 0.30 mol dm⁻³.

    Working

    0.60 → 0.30 and 0.30 → 0 are equal changes.
  2. Extend the constant gradient

    Method

    Add another 40 s to the first 40 s.

    Reason

    Equal concentration changes take equal times on a straight line.

    Working

    Zero is reached at 40 + 40 = 80 s.

Common misconception 3

Correct a half-life timing error

Find and correct the mistake

Learner calculation

A starts at 0.80 mol dm⁻³, reaches 0.40 at 30 s and 0.20 at 60 s. A learner says the first half-life is 30 s and the second is 60 s. Identify and correct the error.

Choose the second interval

View solution step by step
  1. Locate successive endpoints

    Method

    Use 30 s as the start of the second halving and 60 s as its end.

    Reason

    Each half-life is an interval between a concentration and half that concentration.

    Working

    Second interval: 60-30 = 30 s.
  2. Correct the conclusion

    Method

    State that both half-lives are 30 s.

    Reason

    The learner confused a graph time coordinate with an elapsed interval.

    Working

    Successive constant half-lives support first-order behaviour.

Examiner practice 4

Classify two concentration–time traces

4 marks

Problem

Trace P records concentrations 0.80, 0.60, 0.40, 0.20 mol dm⁻³ at 0, 20, 40 and 60 s. Trace Q records 0.80, 0.40, 0.20, 0.10 mol dm⁻³ at 0, 30, 60 and 90 s. Identify the order supported by each trace and justify both. [4 marks]

Try this before viewing the solution

View solution step by step
  1. Classify P

    1 mark

    Method

    Identify equal absolute decreases in equal times.

    Reason

    P falls by 0.20 mol dm⁻³ every 20 s.

    Working

    P has constant negative gradient.
  2. Conclude for P

    1 mark

    Method

    State that P supports zero order.

    Reason

    Constant concentration change per unit time is the zero-order signature.

    Working

    P: zero order.
  3. Classify Q

    1 mark

    Method

    Identify successive halvings in equal times.

    Reason

    Q halves every 30 s.

    Working

    Q has constant half-life.
  4. Conclude for Q

    1 mark

    Method

    State that Q supports first order.

    Reason

    Concentration-independent half-life is the first-order signature.

    Working

    Q: first order.

Challenge 5

Continue a shifted first-order trace

Minimal support

Problem

On a first-order concentration–time graph, A is 0.60 mol dm⁻³ at 15 s and 0.30 mol dm⁻³ at 55 s. Predict the graph time at which A reaches 0.075 mol dm⁻³.

Try this before viewing the solution

Hints

Hint 1: read the half-life
The halving from 0.60 to 0.30 takes 55-15 seconds.
Hint 2: continue from 55 seconds
From 0.30, two more halvings give 0.15 and then 0.075.
View solution step by step
  1. Find the half-life

    Method

    Subtract the graph times for 0.60 and 0.30.

    Reason

    Those concentrations differ by one halving.

    Working

    t_(1/2) = 55-15 = 40 s.
  2. Count further halvings

    Method

    Continue 0.30 → 0.15 → 0.075.

    Reason

    First-order half-life remains constant.

    Working

    Two additional half-lives require 2(40) = 80 s.
  3. Return to graph time

    Method

    Add 80 s to the 55 s coordinate.

    Reason

    The question asks for the graph time, not only elapsed time after 55 s.

    Working

    A reaches 0.075 mol dm⁻³ at 135 s.

Mind Stretchers

Attempt each unfamiliar application before opening the hint, then compare your reasoning with the solution.

Mind stretcher 1: Distinguishing two claimsExtension

Question. A graph has a constant gradient. Does it also have a constant half-life?

Show Hint

Compare the time for 0.80→0.40 with 0.40→0.20 on a straight line.

Show Answer

No. Equal concentration decreases take equal time, so the smaller second halving takes less time. Constant gradient supports zero order, not constant half-life.

Mind stretcher 2: Evidence with scatterExtension

Question. Successive half-lives are 41, 39 and 42 s. Give a defensible conclusion.

Show Hint

Treat realistic measurements as approximate.

Show Answer

They are approximately constant within experimental scatter, supporting first-order behaviour.